|
Post by Addie on Jun 19, 2014 21:26:25 GMT -5
- Write letter to Hamilton, Adams, proclaiming support to their party, and renewed efforts on a National Bank.
|
|
|
Post by Addie on Jun 19, 2014 22:25:02 GMT -5
To the honorable John Adams, Vice-President of these united States, and to the honorable Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury:
I hope this correspondence finds you well. While I admit I am new to the government of this country, only having been elected to represent the port city of Charleston in the State of South Carolina recently, I must admit that I am honored to count among my colleagues such dedicated servants such as yourselves.
I write for the main reason to note that the idea and the dream of a National Bank cannot, nor should not, die given the recent vote in Congress. As a young nation, we need an institution that can help to maintain financial order, establish credit for both public and private persons, and to promote stability in the nation's currency. We need an institution that will assist in the funding of public projects and promote private investments that will be backed by the full faith and credit of these united States and that will build financial strength that we will need in our overseas dealings. Such effort will need to be taken on if, like Republicans suggest, we are to take on debt incurred by the several States prior to the founding of the current government, and it is my hope that such messaging, and such compromise, may end with a beneficial result for the individual and the united States.
I write this knowing, of course, that your knowledge of the benefits of such an institution and your desire to see such an institution established no doubt eclipse my own. I know that your disappointment with the attempt in Congress to pass the legislation no doubt similarly eclipses my own. But I want to write to say that I do not intend to give up. I intend to, working with yourselves, reintroduce the Bank legislation, and to pass it through Congress with help of all those who share our ideas and who believe in the strength of this country.
I fully intend to stand with the Federalists as it is they who have been instrumental in building the government that we have today- a strong government that I am sure will stand the test of time. And while there are some whose faith has been shaken, it is my intent that, starting with the Bank, we can develop a unified program that will restore the faith of elected representatives as well as the people.
It is with great respect that I write. Sincerely yours, I am
/s/ Andrew Beaumont Congressman for South Carolina's 1st Congressional District
|
|
|
Post by Addie on Jun 20, 2014 12:27:03 GMT -5
To the honorable Frederick Muhlenberg, Speaker of the House of Representatives for the First Congress:
I hope this correspondence finds you well, and I must start by saying that of all the men called to serve the birth of this Republic that you have among the most difficult jobs, serving as the chief presiding officer of a chamber of varied viewpoints as we debate and legislate on the issues most important to these united States. It is my hope that your time in office is well-remembered as we have moved forward on important questions that will decide the course of this country for years to come.
As a fellow supporter of this Administration, I hope to write to you on another important question that will no doubt set a precedent for the future; my hope is that such precedent is a positive one. While the Constitution does ensure that it is the entire House of Representatives that chooses the Speaker of the House, the decision to assign duties to selected deputies lies with the Speaker alone. While I have no disagreement with the quality of work that has come from the current Deputy, the honorable Representative from New Hampshire, recent events have give me concern with loyalties and conflicts of interest.
You have heard, as have many here in the capital, of a new movement and a new political organization founded by your own Deputy entitled the "New Democracy Party." While the goals of this organization align with those of the Administration that you and I so strongly support, I believe the question needs to be asked whether this new organization is about ideals central to the Republic or if it is instead a cult of personality given the bombastic nature in which this new organization has been created and promoted. Of course this is merely personal speculation.
The more concerning aspect is what this can do for our august House. This country was founded on many principles, but one of them being the representatives of the people and the idea that while the majority rules, the minority has its rights protected. Until the upcoming elections and the seating of a new Congress, it is the group which could be called the Federalists, of which our colleague and your Deputy was so recently a part, that has won the right as a governing party in the eyes of the people of this Republic, while the group known as the New Democracy has not stood for election even once. To keep a member of this new party in such a high-ranking position suggests that rather than being responsive to the needs and the desires of the people for a strong central government that can defend the Republic, we're responsive to the attraction of a particular personality. I respect whichever decision you make as it rests with you, but I would suggest humbly that, to keep to the principle that we are Representatives of the people and not their masters, that you consider immediately finding a new Deputy to assist you in presiding over the First Congress.
It is with great respect that I write. Sincerely yours, I am
/s/
Andrew Beaumont
Congressman for South Carolina's 1st Congressional District
|
|
|
Post by Addie on Jun 21, 2014 22:14:06 GMT -5
EDITORIAL for the New York Daily Times on the "New Democracy Party"
Points to cover: -Clearly a cult of personality. Members couldn't be bothered to engage in debate, to author bills, and have only themselves to blame for the failure of the national bank, which they blame on Federalist leadership. Pull on Benedict Arnold and the Jays (Washington assassins) for imagery.
- Friends and lovers of mob rule. Like the former Republican that demanded every law be sent to the people for a vote, they want nothing more than an Athenian Democracy- where every white male in the country can have a say on the laws that govern our economy or our foreign affairs.
|
|
|
Post by Addie on Jun 22, 2014 11:05:36 GMT -5
The National Democrats seek the subversion of the American Ideal
Ethan Richland, Representative of South Carolina's First District
It was Thomas Jefferson who, in his hard work to found our great Republic, once said "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." The honorable Mr. Jefferson, like the other founders of these united States, knew more than anyone the importance on building a nation- perhaps the first of its kind- that was build on laws and not on the rule of the mob or the rule of popularity.
Yet, as the tyrant King George claimed the idea of "divine right" and "will of the people" for his actions as the King of England and for the actions that directly lead to the birth of our Republic, so too is the idea of rule of the mob and rule of popularity showing up on our shores in the form of the so-called "National Democracy Party." Their primary reason of existence, so they claimed in letters to other members of the government, is to "give voice" to the people by expanding the right to vote in these united States. It is any male, they say, that should be given an equal say in government affairs. And it is their name- National Democracy- that shows they clearly want to give the common man ALL say. Recently in Congress I was witness to a debate wherein one Representative suggested that a national budget- along with every other law- should be put to the people and to the mob for a decision. Imagine what that means for Massachusetts when the "people" of the Carolinas have a say on tariffs and you have, reader, a picture of the chaos brought to you by the National Democrats and their brain-brothers throughout the country.
But wait, says our dear reader who, by virtue of reading this paper, is educated in the ways of governance. The National Democrats were formerly Federalists. Believers in the Federalist ideals, not in mob rule. Supporters of this Administration of President Washington and Vice-President Adams. This is, if the National Democrats are to be believed, true. Their dissatisfaction comes from, so it is claimed, the failure of the National Bank.
No member of the new National Democrats voted for the legislation when the House of Representatives considered it. While there may be a failure here, it is not limited to one party. Every member of this new party, the Party of Mob Rule, had a responsibility that they abandoned, like Benedict Arnold was prepared to abandon the responsibility of defending an independent Republic. Like Samuel Jay, associate of Arnold that conspired to assassinate the President, they sought to take advantage of their own failures to seem as though they are in the right. It would not surprise this author nor educated readers that the National Democrats are certainly welcoming Arnold and Jay into their bosoms. And like Samuel Jay and Benedict Arnold, this Party of Mob Rule and of Assassins of the Republic seek to build their own nation, ignoring what the great founders established and the Republic that we were given.
The Party of Mob Rule and of Assassins of the Republic wants to claim that they are the the true leaders of this Republic. They are build around a cult of personality, not around law. They are build around the rule of the masses that can oppress minority populations- the land-owners, the slave-owners, and the educated in north and south that have made this country successful.
In the words of Vice-President John Adams, "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." It is clear with their dangerous ideas, with their dangerous friends, and with their dangerous existence, that all citizens of these united States would be better served with a suicide of the National Democrats that came sooner, rather than later.
|
|
|
Post by Addie on Jul 2, 2014 14:53:35 GMT -5
Rhetoric I (Engage in bill debate) Surrogates I (Establish a Manor/House) Cash I (Post a will [$15]) Intelligence I (Sponsor a bill) Charisma I (Upload an Avatar) Wealth I (Create a warchest)
Rhetoric II (Write an Editorial) Surrogates II (File for Re-elect)
Cash II (Update Warchest [$35]) Intelligence II (Start a Journal, Complete 10 entries) Charisma II (Correspond with another individual) Wealth II (Earn $150 from newspaper/minigame in one year)
Rhetoric III (Create a newspaper, [costs $300]) Surrogates III (Pass legislation through House) Cash III (Successfully be re-elected, [receive $50]) Intelligence III (Grow newspaper to NATIONAL stature) Charisma III (Create a caucus with 4 active members) Wealth III (Earn $500 from newspaper/minigame in one year)
Rhetoric IV (#1 show in Williamsburg for 5 consecutive years) Surrogates IV (One character dies) Cash IV (Be elected House Speaker, [receive $100]) Intelligence IV (Pass legislation into law) Charisma IV (sign into roll call after re-election) Wealth IV (Have $10,000 in warchest at one time)
Rhetoric V (Have famous quote in Year in Review) Surrogates V (Have characters serving in House and Senate concurrently) Cash V (Be elected Governor, [receive $250]) Intelligence V (Be named Player of the Year) Charisma V (Become first President from your political party) Wealth V (Have $25,000 in warchest at one time)
Cash VI (Be elected President, [receive $500]) Cash VII (Be elected President with 80% of ELECTORAL votes, [receive $1000]) Cash VIII (Single character serves in Congress, as President, and on Supreme Court)
|
|