|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 18:30:20 GMT -5
I understand that Clay does not like me. I understand that I was not the person he wanted for this slot. I understand that we had a rules dispute, and I understand that he is frustrated by the fact that the amendment in favor of my interpretation won and his lost. I expect there to be some sour grapes, and I also expect that he probably won't like me. But to try and actually wreck the progress of the House because of personal differences is totally unacceptable, and something we should not tolerate from our House Majority Leader. conceivedinliberty.freeforums.net/thread/290/point-order?page=1&scrollTo=1235 Seriously dude, you need to stop. |
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 18:33:39 GMT -5
To say that I alone have committed said malfeasons hilarious. You need to stop yourself. You went, and bartered with the Republicans, to get your way. You have completely tried to tarnish my name in the press, and yet you say that I am the cause. You are a disgrace to this party, and your acts are intolerable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 18:37:27 GMT -5
From day one you have pursued a personal vendetta against me, whether it was insulting me on the day this game opened or, just the other day, insultingly approaching me when there was a legitimate disagreement over House rules.
Disagreeing with your fellow party member is one thing - your behavior is something entirely different and clearly detrimental to the well-being of this body.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 18:40:21 GMT -5
And you have not had a vendetta towards me? You made it clear that you would not work, until you finished your besmirching of my name, and then would wave the white flag. Your behavior is just as bad as you feel mine is. Say what you will, but you are my equal, or a liar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 18:43:39 GMT -5
That I would not work? Are you dense? Your first criticism of me was that I put up bills for a debate that you did not hand select - your issue with me was that I was working.
And wave a white flag? What the fuck are you even on about? I did tell you that if you did not back off I would have to take steps to retaliate, but asked you to let it go. You refused, instead deciding to act like a total imbecile (and give fodder, I might add, to the Democratic Republicans) and accuse me of tyranny.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 18:47:48 GMT -5
You were disobeying the rules of the house. Is that not a cause for alarm? You tried to call a truce, after you had made a move to harm me. To accuse you of tyranny is a misconception. It is not an accusation. It is the truth. Whether you can handle that or not, that is your own prerogative, but do not disgrace yourself and the party in the progress.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 18:49:16 GMT -5
I was not disobeying the Rules of the House - there was a legitimate disagreement over the rules, which was settled by amendment. The only person making a disgrace of themselves and their party is you.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 18:54:04 GMT -5
Oh the laughter you bring me. Your views don't even fit with this party. What are you doing here? Leave and join your friends on the Republican side of the aisle. They'll help you like they have as of recently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 18:57:50 GMT -5
My views fit perfectly in line with the Federalist Party of 1789. The fact that you are running around and acting as though the goal of the Federalist Party was to entirely subjugate the states just shows how horrendously ignorant of American history you are.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 18:59:01 GMT -5
You said yourself that the states deserve more autonomy, which would, help me here. "Take away from the power of the federal government." Is that federalistic. I think not!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 19:00:40 GMT -5
I never said that they deserve 'more autonomy.' I merely recognized the level of autonomy they actually receive under the Constitution, which was composed primarily by people that we would recognize as Federalists.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 19:01:56 GMT -5
You certainly did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Battle Hughes on Jun 10, 2014 19:02:53 GMT -5
Read a history book.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgonieal on Jun 10, 2014 19:06:44 GMT -5
You just dodged it, and insulted my historical knowledge. Is that a good quality in a person supposedly leading the charge in the house? I think not.
|
|
